[1]何生平,柳良仁,谭习群,等.长庆油田水平井二流量试井数据去噪方法[J].油气井测试,2019,28(04):7-13.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2019.04.002]
 HE Shengping,LIU Liangren,TAN Xiqun,et al.Denoising method for twoflow well testing data of horizontal wells in Changqing Oilfield[J].Well Testing,2019,28(04):7-13.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2019.04.002]
点击复制

长庆油田水平井二流量试井数据去噪方法()
分享到:

《油气井测试》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:12-1485/TE]

卷:
28
期数:
2019年04期
页码:
7-13
栏目:
出版日期:
2019-08-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Denoising method for twoflow well testing data of horizontal wells in Changqing Oilfield
文章编号:
1004-4388(2019)04-0007-07
作者:
何生平柳良仁谭习群杨军安小平
中国石油长庆油田分公司勘探开发研究院 陕西西安 710021
Author(s):
HE Shengping LIU Liangren TAN Xiqun YANG Jun AN Xiaoping
Exploration and Development Research Institute of Changqing Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Xi′an, Shaanxi 710021, China                          
关键词:
长庆油田 二流量测试 压力恢复测试 试井解释 最小二乘法 数据去噪 光滑度
Keywords:
Changqing Oilfield twoflow testing pressure buildup test well testing interpretation least square method data denoising smoothness      
分类号:
TE353
DOI:
10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2019.04.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
长庆油田水平井二流量测试中存在着测试数据质量差、试井解释难度大、解释结果偏差较大等问题。在研究分析104井次测试数据质量的基础上,针对试井分析资料,提出一种基于最小二乘曲线拟合原理的数据去噪处理方法,对曲线形态较好、光滑性较差的数据进行去噪处理。将一口井二流量测试数据去噪前后的解释结果与同一口井的压力恢复测试解释结果进行对比,结果表明,去噪前的解释结果与压力恢复解释结果差异较大,最大相对误差可达95%;而去噪后的解释结果与压力恢复解释结果较为接近,最大相对误差仅为79%,验证了该处理方法的准确性。该方法有效挖掘了质量较差的测试资料中的有用数据,提高了长庆油田水平井二流量测试数据解释结果的可靠性。
Abstract:
There are problems in the twoflow testing of horizontal wells in Changqing Oilfield, such as poor quality of testing data, difficulty in well test interpretation, and serious deviation of interpretation results. After analyzing the data quality of 104 wells test, a data denoising method based on the principle of least squares curve fitting for the well test analysis data was proposed, which can denoise the data with better curve shape and worse smoothness. In practical application, the interpretation results of the twoflow testing data before and after denoising of the same well was compared with the results of its pressure buildup test interpretation. The results show that the interpretation result before denoising was significantly different from the pressure buildup interpretation result, and the maximum relative error can be up to 95%; however, after denoising, the interpretation result was close to the pressure buildup interpretation result, and the maximum relative error was only 79%. This comparison verified the accuracy of the processing method. This method effectively excavated useful data from test data with poor quality and improved the reliability of interpretation results of twoflow testing data of horizontal wells in Changqing Oilfield.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
2018-12-14收稿,2019-05-12修回,2019-07-04接受,2019-08-20 网络版发表
中国石油长庆油田公司勘探开发研究院科研项目“水平井试井解释模型研究及软件编制”(技2016-30)
何生平,男,1983年出生,工程师,2008年毕业于吉林大学地球科学学院资源勘察工程(石油天然气)专业,主要从事油田开发及动态监测相关工作。电话:029-86591561;Email:hsp_cq@petrochina.com.cn。通信地址:陕西省西安市未央区兴隆园小区,邮政编码:710018。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-09-03