[1]肖杭州,于友,刘美成,等. 吉林油田低渗透油藏储层综合分类评价技术[J].油气井测试,2021,30(03):70-78.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2021.03.012]
　XIAO Hangzhou,YU You,LIU Meicheng,et al. Comprehensive classification and evaluation technology for low permeability reservoir in Jilin Oilfield[J].Well Testing,2021,30(03):70-78.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2021.03.012]
点击复制

 吉林油田低渗透油藏储层综合分类评价技术()
分享到：

《油气井测试》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:12-1485/TE]

卷:
30卷
期数:
2021年03期
页码:
70-78
栏目:
出版日期:
2021-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Comprehensive classification and evaluation technology for low permeability reservoir in Jilin Oilfield
文章编号:
1004-4388(2021)03-0070-09
作者:
 肖杭州1; 于友2; 刘美成3; 李忠诚1; 王振军1
 1.中国石油吉林油田分公司勘探开发研究院 吉林松原 138000
2.中国石油吉林油田分公司 吉林松原 138000
3.中国石油吉林油田分公司开发部 吉林松原 138000
Author(s):
 XIAO Hangzhou1;  YU You2;  LIU Meicheng3;  LI Zhongcheng1;  WANG Zhenjun1
关键词:
 ; 低渗透储层; 扶余油层; 高台子油层; 储层分类; 灰色关联; 储层特征; 概率累积法; 采收率
Keywords:
 ; 

low permeability reservoir;  Fuyu reservoir;  Gaotaizi reservoir;  reservoir classification;  grey

correlation;  reservoir characteristics;  probability accumulation method;  recovery factor

分类号:
TE357
DOI:
10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2021.03.012
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
 

吉林油田低渗透储层注采关系建立难度大，采收率较低，且不同区块开发效果存在较大差异。分类参数、界限不统一，储层分类

评价无法进行。总结吉林油田低渗透油藏宏观、微观储层特征，结合典型区块动态开发效果影响因素，先初选分类参数，再利用灰色关联法确定最终分类参数。引用概率累积

法，计算各定量参数的分类界限，同时借鉴Feci综合指数法，对储层进行综合分类评价，建立了吉林油田扶余、高台子油层的综合分类标准。利用储层分类的标准，对各油田

扶余及高台子油层的146个开发单元进行了归类，总结出制约低渗透各类储层开发的主要矛盾和问题，明确了提高采收率的攻关方向，为各类储层制定主导开发技术政策奠定

了基础。

Abstract:
 

It is difficult to establish the injectionproduction relationship of low permeability

reservoir in Jilin Oilfield. As a result, the recovery rate is low, and the development effect of different blocks is different. In addition, the

classification parameters and boundaries are not unified, so the reservoir classification and evaluation cannot be carried out. This paper summarizes

the macro and micro reservoir characteristics of low permeability reservoirs in Jilin Oilfield, and combines the influencing factors of dynamic

development effect of 〖JP3〗typical blocks. The classification parameters are selected first, and then the final classification parameters are

determined by grey correlation method. In addition, the probability accumulation method is used to calculate the classification limit

of each quantitative parameter, and the Feci comprehensive index method is used for comprehensive classification and evaluation of reservoirs, and the

comprehensive classification standards of Fuyu and Gaotaizi reservoirs in Jilin Oilfield are established. Finally, 146 development units of Fuyu and

Gaotaizi reservoirs in Jilin Oilfield are classified according to the reservoir classification standard, and the main contradictions and problems

restricting the development of various low permeability reservoirs are summarized. The research direction of EOR is clarified, which lays the foundation

for the formulation of leading development technology policy for various reservoirs.

相似文献/References:

[1]曹银萍,黄宇曦,于凯强,等. 基于ANSYS Workbench完井管柱流固耦合振动固有频率分析[J].油气井测试,2018,27(01):1.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.01.001]
　CAO Yinping,HUANG Yuxi,YU Kaiqiang,et al. Natural frequency analysis for fluidsolid coupling vibration of completion string based on ANSYS workbench[J].Well Testing,2018,27(03):1.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.01.001]
[2]高 超,艾 昆,高 辉,等. 基于施工压力曲线的综合滤失系数测试方法及压裂参数优化[J].油气井测试,2018,27(01):8.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.01.002]
　GAO Chao,AI Kun,GAO Hui,et al.Test method of total leak-off coefficient and optimization of fracturing parameters based on operation pressure curves[J].Well Testing,2018,27(03):8.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.01.002]
[3]周小林,高志华,张 冲.龙凤山气田大通径免钻桥塞分段压裂先导试验[J].油气井测试,2018,27(01):62.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.01.010]
　ZHOU Xiaolin,GAO Zhihua,ZHANG Chong. Pilot tests of staged fracturing involving largediameter drillfree bridge plugs in the Longfengshan gas field[J].Well Testing,2018,27(03):62.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.01.010]
[4]魏 聪,陈宝新,刘 敏,等. 基于反褶积技术的S气井不稳定试井解释[J].油气井测试,2018,27(01):73.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.01.012]
　WEI Cong,CHEN Baoxin,LIU Min,et al. Interpretation of pressure transient well testing data of S gas well based on deconvolution technique[J].Well Testing,2018,27(03):73.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.01.012]
[5]张中宝.塔河油田深抽杆式泵一体化管柱工艺[J].油气井测试,2018,27(02):27.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.005]
　ZHANG Zhongbao.Deep integrated rod pumping string applied in Tahe Oilfield[J].Well Testing,2018,27(03):27.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.005]
[6]李军贤.地层出砂井测试工艺优化[J].油气井测试,2018,27(02):47.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.008]
　LI Junxian.Optimization of testing techniques for wells with formation sand production[J].Well Testing,2018,27(03):47.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.008]
[7]田向东,康 露,杨 志,等.海上油气井快速诱喷测试技术[J].油气井测试,2018,27(02):41.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.007]
　TIAN Xiangdong,KANG Lu,YANG Zhi,et al.Fast testing of induced flows in offshore oil/gas wells[J].Well Testing,2018,27(03):41.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.007]
[8]张 毅,于丽敏,任勇强,等.一种新型可降解压裂封隔器坐封球[J].油气井测试,2018,27(02):53.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.009]
　ZHANG Yi,YU Limin,REN Yongqiang,et al.A new type of degradable setting ball for fracturing packers[J].Well Testing,2018,27(03):53.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.009]
[9]褚春波,郭 权,黄小云,等.有限元分析径向水力压裂裂缝扩展影响因素[J].油气井测试,2018,27(02):59.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.010]
　CHU Chunbo,GUO Quan,HUANG Xiaoyun,et al.Finiteelement analysis on influencing factors for propagation of fractures induced in radial jet hydraulic fracturing[J].Well Testing,2018,27(03):59.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.010]
[10]庞伟.酸性气藏深井产能试井方法[J].油气井测试,2018,27(02):67.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.011]
　PANG Wei.Deliverability test method for deep sour gas wells[J].Well Testing,2018,27(03):67.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.011]
[11]李风光,吕选鹏,王晓磊,等.浅层低渗透油气井超低温压裂液体系研究[J].油气井测试,2021,30(05):37.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2021.05.007]
　LI Fengguang,LYU Xuanpeng,WANG Xiaolei,et al. Study on ultralow temperature fracturing fluid system for shallow oil and gas wells with low permeability[J].Well Testing,2021,30(03):37.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2021.05.007]
[12]郝龙图. 葡48X区块微波持水率测试方法[J].油气井测试,2021,30(06):57.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2021.06.010]
　HAO Longtu. Microwave water holding rate test method for Pu48X block[J].Well Testing,2021,30(03):57.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2021.06.010]
[13]王成旺,刘晓庆,陈文斌,等. 彭阳油田自生热增能压裂技术[J].油气井测试,2022,31(06):27.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2022.06.006]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 2020-08-04收稿，2021-05-01修回，2021-05-10接受，2021-06-20 网络版发表
中国石油天然气股份公司技术攻关项目“吉林低渗-特低渗油藏提高采收率关键技术研究”（2017B-1307）

肖杭州，男，1983年出生，硕士，高级工程师，2010年毕业于长江大学矿产普查与勘探专业，主要从事油气田开发技术研究。
电话：0438-6274189，15981435166；Email：254032045@qq.com 。通信地址：吉林省松原市宁江区锦江大街1号勘探开发研究院，邮政编码：138000。

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-08-10