[1]周小林,高志华,张 冲.龙凤山气田大通径免钻桥塞分段压裂先导试验[J].油气井测试,2018,27(01):62-67.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.01.010]
　ZHOU Xiaolin,GAO Zhihua,ZHANG Chong. Pilot tests of staged fracturing involving largediameter drillfree bridge plugs in the Longfengshan gas field[J].Well Testing,2018,27(01):62-67.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.01.010]
点击复制

龙凤山气田大通径免钻桥塞分段压裂先导试验()
分享到：

《油气井测试》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
27
期数:
2018年01期
页码:
62-67
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-02-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Pilot tests of staged fracturing involving largediameter drillfree bridge plugs in the Longfengshan gas field
文章编号:
1004-4388(2018)01-0062-06
作者:
周小林; 高志华; 张  冲
中国石油化工集团公司东北油气分公司石油工程技术研究院  吉林长春  130062  
Author(s):
 ZHOU Xiaolin; GAO Zhihua;  ZHANG Chong
 Petroleum Engineering Technology Research Institute, Northeast Oil and Gas Company, Changchun, Jilin 130062, China
关键词:
 ; 构造—岩性油气藏; 大通径免钻桥塞; 可溶球; 分段压裂; 先导试验; 龙凤山气田; 水平井
Keywords:

Structural lithologic reservoir;  largediameter drillfree bridge plug;  ; 

dissolvable ball;  staged fracturing;  pilot test;  Longfengshan Gas Field;  horizontal well ;  ; 

分类号:
TE353
DOI:
10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.01.010
文献标志码:
B
摘要:

龙凤山气田是以特低孔、特低渗储层为主的构造—岩性气藏，水平井分段压裂改造中采用的可钻桥塞

通径小，压裂结束后需将桥塞钻掉，既延长投产周期，又增加施工风险。大通径免钻桥塞配套可溶球的分段压裂技术中，大通径桥塞拥有足够大的流通通道，可溶球在

压裂阶段具有可靠的密封性，压裂完较短时间内可形成流道，允许桥塞留在井筒内，不干扰后期放喷或生产。室内开展了可溶性球在不同温度清水、原胶液和返排液中

的溶蚀实验，发现可溶球在清水中几乎不溶解，在原胶液或返排液中均可溶解，在95℃返排液中完全溶解需要约90h，完全满足分段压裂时间的需要。在龙凤山气田3口

井进行了大通径免钻桥塞射孔联作分段压裂先导试验，压裂注入总液量15078m3，最高泵注压力669MPa，停泵压力15～34MPa，平均注入排量78m3/min，压后

日产气1416×104m3，日产油22t，与易钻桥塞工艺相比节约施工时间6d，节省费用43万元。该技术施工后可直接进行放喷投产，充分发挥了压裂投产一体化优势

，在致密低渗气藏开采中具有一定的推广价值。

Abstract:

Longfengshan Gas Field is featured by structurallithologic gas reservoirs,

mainly with ultralow porosity and ultralow permeability. The diameter of the drillable bridge plug that is used in horizontal well staged

fracturing is so small that the bridge plug must be drilled after the fracturing. This not only lengthens the period before production but also

increases the risk during operation. However, the largediameter drillfree bridge plug used with dissolvable ball can provide an enough flow

path while the dissolvable ball can keep the excellent sealing performance during the fracturing and leave a flow path in a short time after

fracturing. Then, the bridge plug is left in the wellbore and does not influence the open flow or the production. The dissolution experiment of

the dissolvable ball was conducted in fresh water, gel liquid and the fracturing flowback fluid. It was found that the ball cannot dissolve in

fresh water but can do in gel liquid and the fracturing flowback fluid. The time for the ball entirely to dissolve in fracturing flowback

fluid should cost 90 hours, which can effectively satisfy demands for fracturing operations in horizontal wells during effective acting time.

Pilot tests were conducted in three wells in the Longfengshan Gas Field, with total volume of fracturing fluids of 15078 m3, the maximum

pumping pressure of 669 MPa, pumpoff pressure of 15–34 MPa and average fluid pumping rate of 78 m3/min. Productivity was enhanced

significantly with the total gas production rate of 1416×104m3/d and the total oil production rate of 22t/d. Compared with the drillable

bridge plug, this technique can save operational time of 6d and cost of 430000 RMB. The research results show that the staged fracturing

involving largediameter drillfree bridge plugs can provide suitable solutions for the deeplyburied reservoirs in the Longfengshan Gas Field,

where the plug drilling via coiled tubing in long horizontal section is difficult and low in time efficiency. With the advantage of integral

fracturing and production, this technique can be promoted more extensively in development of tight lowpermeability gas reservoirs.

相似文献/References:

[1]曹银萍,黄宇曦,于凯强,等. 基于ANSYS Workbench完井管柱流固耦合振动固有频率分析[J].油气井测试,2018,27(01):1.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.01.001]
　CAO Yinping,HUANG Yuxi,YU Kaiqiang,et al. Natural frequency analysis for fluidsolid coupling vibration of completion string based on ANSYS workbench[J].Well Testing,2018,27(01):1.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.01.001]
[2]高 超,艾 昆,高 辉,等. 基于施工压力曲线的综合滤失系数测试方法及压裂参数优化[J].油气井测试,2018,27(01):8.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.01.002]
　GAO Chao,AI Kun,GAO Hui,et al.Test method of total leak-off coefficient and optimization of fracturing parameters based on operation pressure curves[J].Well Testing,2018,27(01):8.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.01.002]
[3]魏 聪,陈宝新,刘 敏,等. 基于反褶积技术的S气井不稳定试井解释[J].油气井测试,2018,27(01):73.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.01.012]
　WEI Cong,CHEN Baoxin,LIU Min,et al. Interpretation of pressure transient well testing data of S gas well based on deconvolution technique[J].Well Testing,2018,27(01):73.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.01.012]
[4]张中宝.塔河油田深抽杆式泵一体化管柱工艺[J].油气井测试,2018,27(02):27.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.005]
　ZHANG Zhongbao.Deep integrated rod pumping string applied in Tahe Oilfield[J].Well Testing,2018,27(01):27.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.005]
[5]李军贤.地层出砂井测试工艺优化[J].油气井测试,2018,27(02):47.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.008]
　LI Junxian.Optimization of testing techniques for wells with formation sand production[J].Well Testing,2018,27(01):47.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.008]
[6]田向东,康 露,杨 志,等.海上油气井快速诱喷测试技术[J].油气井测试,2018,27(02):41.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.007]
　TIAN Xiangdong,KANG Lu,YANG Zhi,et al.Fast testing of induced flows in offshore oil/gas wells[J].Well Testing,2018,27(01):41.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.007]
[7]张 毅,于丽敏,任勇强,等.一种新型可降解压裂封隔器坐封球[J].油气井测试,2018,27(02):53.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.009]
　ZHANG Yi,YU Limin,REN Yongqiang,et al.A new type of degradable setting ball for fracturing packers[J].Well Testing,2018,27(01):53.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.009]
[8]褚春波,郭 权,黄小云,等.有限元分析径向水力压裂裂缝扩展影响因素[J].油气井测试,2018,27(02):59.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.010]
　CHU Chunbo,GUO Quan,HUANG Xiaoyun,et al.Finiteelement analysis on influencing factors for propagation of fractures induced in radial jet hydraulic fracturing[J].Well Testing,2018,27(01):59.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.010]
[9]庞伟.酸性气藏深井产能试井方法[J].油气井测试,2018,27(02):67.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.011]
　PANG Wei.Deliverability test method for deep sour gas wells[J].Well Testing,2018,27(01):67.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.011]
[10]梁 斌,谭先红,焦松杰,等.东海低孔低渗气田气井压裂投产后“一点法”产能方程[J].油气井测试,2018,27(02):73.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.012]
　LIANG Bin,TAN Xianhong,JIAO Songjie,et al.“Singlepoint” productivity equation for fractured gas wells in lowporosity and lowpermeability reservoirs, East China Sea[J].Well Testing,2018,27(01):73.[doi:10.19680/j.cnki.1004-4388.2018.02.012]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

 2017-06-30投稿，2017-11-15修回，2017-11-20接受，2018-03-30网络发表
周小林，男，1987年出生，工程师，2010年毕业于西安石油大学石油工程专业，现主要

从事油气储层改造工作。电话：0431-88531852，18686485654；Email：Zhouxl.dbsj@sinopec.com。地址：吉林省长春市绿园区和平大街660号，邮政编码：130062。

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-04-26